Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Jonas Trinker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Trinker analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Jonas Trinker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 1 Trinker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 49.26% of points on their second serve, while Trinker has won 43.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Trinker has won 56.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.35% and 37.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trinker has saved 51.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Trinker winning 48.89% (W/L 22/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 194), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Trinker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 123/ 120).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 24/ 22), where as Trinker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 22/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Trinker being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Fatic winning 3 and Trinker winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Trinker was at the M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 09-10-2019, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Trinker have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Trinker 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Trinker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.62 while Trinker has played against players with an average rank of 130.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trinker has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 38.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trinker has converted 44.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
861
Rank
755
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (343-257)
Career Total W/L
52% (209-190)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
60% (9-6)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Jonas Trinker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 30 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:30 | 2:19:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (159/199) | 71% (139/196) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (94/159) | 67% (93/139) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (18/40) | 32% (18/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 61% (11/18) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (85/196) | 44% (87/199) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jonas Trinker
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Nerman Fatic
85%
(
99 of
116)
1st Serve %
87%
(
109 of
125)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
59 of
109)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Jonas Trinker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 60% (9/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (25/30) | 53% (18/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (249/272) | 52% (166/156) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.58 | 68.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (981/1521) | 59% (457/779) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (673/981) | 66% (300/457) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (266/540) | 43% (140/322) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (50/131) | 45% (42/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (575/1563) | 44% (344/778) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 60% (9/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 33% (9/3) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jonas Trinker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Conor Gannon
Player
Jonas Trinker
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Valeriy Martishev
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Duje Markovina
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Jonas Trinker
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Nikos Lehmann
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Melvin Kumar
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Ivan Perez Martin
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Carl Sjoholm
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Trinker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fatic are available here and Trinker photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nerman Fatic
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jonas Trinker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
